As informa??es desta p¨¢gina n?o est?o completamente dispon¨ªveis no seu idioma de escolha. Esperamos disponibiliza-las integralmente em outros idiomas em breve. Para ter acesso ¨¤s informa??es no idioma de sua prefer¨ºncia, fa?a o download do PDF ²¹±ç³Ü¨ª.
Atualizado em : Jan 31, 2011
N?O ENTROU NA EDI??O ATUAL
Este blip n?o est¨¢ na edi??o atual do Radar. Se esteve em uma das ¨²ltimas edi??es, ¨¦ prov¨¢vel que ainda seja relevante. Se o blip for mais antigo, pode n?o ser mais relevante e nossa avalia??o pode ser diferente hoje. Infelizmente, n?o conseguimos revisar continuamente todos os blips de edi??es anteriores do Radar.
Saiba mais
Jan 2011
Experimente
Functional languages have a wide range of practical uses, including simulation, computational fi nance, computational science, large scale data processing and parsing. These fields benefit from functional programming techniques that simplify concurrent execution and the expression of complex mathematical functions concisely. Functional programming requires a shift in thinking for enterprise developers experienced in object oriented development. Moving to an often terse syntax for solving complex problems may initially be intimidating to many. As with all forms of programming languages, syntax is just one aspect of the language itself. In functional programming another significant aspect is the use of common idioms. These idioms speed code comprehension and increase overall maintainability. This might not be news to all, but it is worth noting that dynamic languages are long ready for adoption and trial. Ruby, particularly when deployed on JRuby, is ready for adoption. ÷ÈÓ°Ö±²¥ uses Ruby and JRuby extensively in both its Services and Product work. Groovy is ready for trial and could prove more accessible than Ruby/JRuby in a Java shop. For the right type of applications, Ruby, JRuby, and Groovy prove far more effective, expressive, and productive than Java and C#.
Aug 2010
Experimente
Apr 2010
Experimente
Publicado : Apr 29, 2010
