Enable javascript in your browser for better experience. Need to know to enable it?

÷ÈÓ°Ö±²¥

La informaci¨®n en esta p¨¢gina no se encuentra completamente disponible en tu idioma de preferencia. Muy pronto esperamos tenerla completamente disponible en otros idiomas. Para obtener informaci¨®n en tu idioma de preferencia, por favor descarga el PDF ²¹±ç³Ü¨ª.
?ltima actualizaci¨®n : Mar 29, 2017
NO EN LA EDICI?N ACTUAL
Este blip no est¨¢ en la edici¨®n actual del Radar. Si ha aparecido en una de las ¨²ltimas ediciones, es probable que siga siendo relevante. Si es m¨¢s antiguo, es posible que ya no sea relevante y que nuestra valoraci¨®n sea diferente hoy en d¨ªa. Desgraciadamente, no tenemos el ancho de banda necesario para revisar continuamente los anuncios de ediciones anteriores del Radar. Entender m¨¢s
Mar 2017
Resistir ?

We continue to see organizations chasing "cool" technologies, taking on unnecessary complexity and risk when a simpler choice would be better. One particular theme is using distributed, Big Data systems for relatively small data sets. This behavior prompts us to put Big Data envy on hold once more, with some additional data points from our recent experience. The database promises massive scalability on commodity hardware, but we have seen teams overwhelmed by its architectural and operational complexity. Unless you have data volumes that require a 100+ node cluster, we recommend against using Cassandra. The operational team you'll need to keep the thing running just isn't worth it. While creating this edition of the Radar, we discussed several new database technologies, many offering "10x" performance improvements over existing systems. We're always skeptical until new technology¡ªespecially something as critical as a database¡ªhas been properly proven. Jepsen provides of database performance under difficult conditions and has found in various NoSQL databases. We recommend maintaining a healthy dose of skepticism and keeping an eye on sites such as Jepsen when you evaluate database tech.

Nov 2016
Resistir ?

We continue to see organizations chasing "cool" technologies, taking on unnecessary complexity and risk when a simpler choice would be better. One particular theme is using distributed, Big Data systems for relatively small data sets. This behavior prompts us to put Big Data envy on hold once more, with some additional data points from our recent experience. The database promises massive scalability on commodity hardware, but we have seen teams overwhelmed by its architectural and operational complexity. Unless you have data volumes that require a 100+ node cluster, we recommend against using Cassandra. The operational team you¡¯ll need to keep the thing running just isn¡¯t worth it. While creating this edition of the Radar, we discussed several new database technologies, many offering "10x" performance improvements over existing systems. We¡¯re always skeptical until new technology¡ªespecially something as critical as a database¡ªhas been properly proven. Jepsen provides of database performance under difficult conditions and has found in various NoSQL databases. We recommend maintaining a healthy dose of skepticism and keeping an eye on sites such as Jepsen when you evaluate database tech.

Apr 2016
Resistir ?

While we've long understood the value of Big Data to better understand how people interact with us, we've noticed an alarming trend of Big Data envy : organizations using complex tools to handle "not-really-that-big¡± Data. Distributed map-reduce algorithms are a handy technique for large data sets, but many data sets we see could easily fit in a single-node relational or graph database. Even if you do have more data than that, usually the best thing to do is to first pick out the data you need, which can often then be processed on such a single node. So we urge that before you spin up your clusters, take a realistic assessment of what you need to process, and if it fits¡ªmaybe in RAM¡ªuse the simple option.

Publicado : Apr 05, 2016

Suscr¨ªbete al bolet¨ªn informativo de Technology Radar

?

?

?

?

Suscr¨ªbete ahora

Visita nuestro archivo para leer los vol¨²menes anteriores